ghdhair100
Ununokt
Dołączył: 15 Gru 2010
Posty: 1876
Przeczytał: 0 tematów
Ostrzeżeń: 0/5
Skąd: England
|
 Wysłany: Śro 13:07, 16 Mar 2011 Temat postu: capabilities of the new ipod video- dlvy- nicheblo |
|
|
䍡灡扩汩瑩敳映瑨攠湥眠楐潤⁶楤敯ഊഊऍ桥慰慢楬楴楥猠潦⁴桥敷偯搠癩摥漠捯湴楮略⁴桥敶敬潰楮朠灲潣敳猠潦⁴桥汤慰慢楬楴楥猠阠獯晴睡牥Ⱐ桡牤睡牥湤潭灡瑩扩汩瑹⁷楴栠潴桥爠摥癩捥献ਉഊ䍯湣敲湩湧⁴桥潦瑷慲攬琠楳⁷敬氭歮潷渠瑨慴⁴桥偯搠楮敮敲慬湤⁴桥偯搠癩摥漠楮⁰慲瑩捵污爠灬慹⁍倳Ⱐ慵摩扬攠慵摩漠扯潫Ⱐ坁嘬⁍㑁⽁䅃Ⱐ灲潴散瑥搠䅁䌬⁁䥆䘠慮搠䅰灬攠䱯獳汥獳畤楯楬攠景牭慴献⁓楮捥⁴桥‵瑨敮敲慴楯渠楐潤猠瑨敲攠楳湯瑨敲⁰潳獩扩汩瑹映灬慹楮朠洴瘠慮搠浰㐠䵐䕇ⴴ⁶楤敯楬攠景牭慴献⁏湬礠湯渠捯灹⵰牯瑥捴敤⁗䵁楬敳慹攠捯灩敤⁴漠慮偯搮⁏瑨敲潲浡瑳牥潴⁰潳獩扬攠瑯攠灬慹敤礠瑨攠楐潤湤⁴桩猠楳⁴桥慳攠潦⁆䱁䌠慮搠佧朠噯牢楳潲浡瑳⸠ഊ†††ഊ䉥獩摥猬⁴桥偯摳牥獰散楡汬礠摥獩杮敤潲慴捨楮朠瑨攠楔畮敳敤楡楢牡特潦瑷慲攮⁔桩猠潮汩湥畳楣瑯牥灰敡牥搠楮′〰㌠慮搠楴敬汳潮杳湤琠睡猠瑨潵杨琠數捬畳楶敬礠景爠瑨攠楐潤⁵獥牳湤潴潲瑨敲⁰潲瑡扬攠浵獩挠灬慹敲献⁔桩猠浡礠桡癥潮瑲楢畴敤⁴漠瑨攠獵捣敳猠扯瑨⁴桥偯摳湤⁴桥呵湥猠浵獩挠獴潲攠慮搠瑯⁴桥牥慴敶敬潰浥湴湤浰牯癥浥湴猠潦⁴桥偯撒猠捡灡扩汩瑩敳⸍ਠ††桥潦瑷慲攠潦⁴桥敷偯搠癩摥漠桡猠湥眠晥慴畲敳ₖ⁰敲獯湡汩穥搠牥捯浭敮摡瑩潮猠慮搠癩摥漠捯湴敮琠瑨慴慮攠灬慹敤渠愠偣爠瑲慮獦敲牥搠瑯⁴桥偯搮⁔桥潦瑷慲攠睡猠異杲慤敤⁴漠噥牳楯渠㘬慣琠瑨慴数牥獥湴猠愠摥癥汯灭敮琠慮搠愠摩獴楮捴捨楥癥浥湴⸠ഊ†††ഊ䍯湣敲湩湧⁴桥慲摷慲攠潦⁴桥偯摳湥慹慹⁴桡琠瑨攠晩牳琠来湥牡瑩潮偯摳⁷敲攠牥捨慲来搠潮汹⁴桲潵杨⁆楲敗楲攠睩瑨⁴桥敬瀠潦浡汬⁰潷敲摡灴敲⸠周攠㑴栠来湥牡瑩潮偯摳慹慶攠扥敮桡牧敤癥爠啓䈮⁔桥‵瑨敮敲慴楯渠楐潤慹攠捨慲来搠睩瑨⁴桥敬瀠潦潣欠捯湮散瑯爠慬汯睩湧⁴桥⁆楲敗楲攠捡扬攠瑯攠灬畧来搠楮潲⁴桥散桡牧攮ਠ††潭灡瑩扩汩瑹映瑨攠楐潤猠睩瑨⁗楮摯睳猠瑨攠楤敡映䅰灬攬敡汩穥搠楮′〰㈬慣琠瑨慴潮瑲楢畴敤⁴漠瑨攠捲敡瑩潮映愠坩湤潷猠癥牳楯渠潦呵湥猠楮′〰㌮⁔桥偯摳潵汤攠浡摥⁴漠扥潭灡瑩扬攠睩瑨⁍慣楮瑯獨湤⁴桥牥猠慬獯渠楐潤䱩湵砠灲潪散琮ഊऍ潭攠慤摩瑩潮慬敡瑵牥猠浡礠扥敮瑩潮敤⁷桩汥灥慫楮朠慢潵琠瑨攠楐潤猠楮敮敲慬湤偯搠癩摥漠楮⁰慲瑩捵污爮⁔桥偯摳慮楳灬慹⁴數琠晩汥猬慣琠睨楣栠楳⁶敲礠畳敦畬⸠周敲攠慲攠慬獯⁐䑁慬敮摡牳Ⱐ獯浥慭敳⁴桡琠睥牥湴敲敳瑩湧敶敲慬⁹敡牳杯畴⁴桥礠獥敭畴摡瑥搠湯睡摡祳⸠周攠条浥猠慶慩污扬攠潮汭潳琠敶敲礠楐潤硣数琠瑨攠楐潤桵晦汥牥物捫Ⱐ灡牡捨畴攬潬楴慩牥Ⱐ浵獩挠煵楺⸠周攠浯獴湴敲敳瑩湧慭攠楳⁴桥畳楣ⁱ畩稬⁰污祩湧潭攠晲慧浥湴猠潦潭攠獯湧猠慮搠睡楴楮朠瑨攠畳敲⁴漠楤敮瑩晹⁴桥潮朠晲潭楳琮⁔桥楳慤癡湴慧攠潦⁴桩猠条浥猠瑨慴琠畳敳潴映扡瑴敲礠灯睥爮ਉഊ䅬氠瑨敳攠捡灡扩汩瑩敳敥洠瑯攠業灲潶敤渠瑨攠捡獥映瑨攠湥眠楐潤⁶楤敯硣数琠瑨攠捲敡瑩潮映潴桥爠条浥猠潲⁴桥湴牯摵捴楯渠潦敷湥献⁔桩猠浡礠扥敥渠慳楳慤癡湴慧攬畴映瑡歩湧湴漠慣捯畮琠瑨攠晡捴⁴桡琠楴猠愠捡獥映愠灯牴慢汥畳楣⁰污祥爠瑨楳獰散琠摯敳潴慶攠獵捨牥慴浰潲瑡湣攮ਠ††桥湮潶慴楯渠楳映捯畲獥⁴桥⁶楤敯慰慢楬楴礬汴桯畧栠瑨攠浡楮敡瑵牥猠潦⁴桥敷偯搠獴牥獳渠杲敡琠業灲潶敭敮瑳渠瑨攠業慧攠慮搠獯畮搠煵慬楴礮⁔桥⁶楤敯浡来猠獵牰物獩湧汹浯潴栠慮搠楮⁴桩猠睡礠浡礠牥灬慣攠瑨攠獫数瑩捡氠慴瑩瑵摥猠睩瑨潹晵氠數捬慭慴楯湳⸠ഊ†††ഊ䅬瑨潵杨琠楳潴⁴桥楲獴瑴敭灴映扲楮杩湧⁶楤敯渠愠灯牴慢汥慮摨敬搠摥癩捥Ⱐ瑨楳捨楥癥浥湴敥浳⁴漠扥⁴桥潳琠獵捣敳獦畬⸠周楳畣捥獳猠摵攠瑯潴映牥煵楲敤⁷潲欠慮搠捯浰汩捡瑥搠捨慮来猠楮⁴桥潦瑷慲攠慮搠桡牤睡牥猠睥汬⸠䥮⁷慹爠慮潴桥爬⁁灰汥敥浳⁴漠扥⁴桥桡浰楯渠楮牥慴楮朠獰散楡氠灯牴慢汥敶楣敳湤慹扥潭攠潴桥爠獴数猠睩汬攠瑡步渠楮⁴桥敶敬潰浥湴映瑨攠獭慬氠癩摥漠灯牴慢汥敶楣敳⸠䥮⁴桩猠睡礬慹扥灥捩慬潭灡瑩扩汩瑹⁷楴栠浯牥敶楣敳慹攠摥癥汯灥搬湳畲楮朠潴桥爠灥物潤猠潦牥慴畣捥獳⸠佴桥爠潮汩湥瑯牥猠浡礠慰灥慲湤敶敬潰渠瑨攠瑲慤楴楯渠潦⁴桥呵湥猠浵獩挠獴潲攮⁄略⁴漠楐潤猠晲潭⁴桥⁁灰汥⁃潭灡湹敧慬潮瑥湴映瑨攠摯睮汯慤敤湤⁰慩搠浵獩挠潲⁔嘠獨潷猬灩獯摥猠潲瑨敲慴敲楡汳猠敮獵牥搮ഊ†††ഊ偐偐倍ਠ††ਨ睯牤潵湴‶㜱⤍�,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]The Court of Appeal pointed out that R and F's submission in the county court was of overt, conscious racism, and it was not prepared to find that there had been unconscious discrimination.The decisionThe Court of Appeal said that, unlike the ordinary civil claim where the judge decides, on the claimant's evidence only, whether the claimant has made out a case, in this case the judge had had the benefit of the whole of the evidence. Despite the school's failure to comply with the statutory requirements, the judge had been entitled to find on the basis of all the evidence that R and F had not proved racial discrimination.
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
Post został pochwalony 0 razy
|
|
